WALKER v. BARNETT (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Clayton WALKER Plaintiff - Appellant v. Steve BARNETT, Secretary of State, in his official capacity; Shantel Krebs, in her individual capacity; Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity; Jason Ravnsborg, in his official capacity; Kea Warne, in her official capacity Defendants - Appellees

No. 20-2870

Decided: April 02, 2021

Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

Clayton Walker, Pro Se Ann F. Mines Bailey, Attorney General's Office, Pierre, SD, for Defendants - Appellees

[Unpublished]

Clayton Walker appeals following the district court's ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil action challenging the constitutionality of certain South Dakota election laws. Upon careful de novo review, see Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Libertarian Party of N.D. v. Jaeger, 659 F.3d 687, 692-93 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walker's appellate motions.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law