Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Minor Lee MCNEIL Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America; Department of Treasury Defendants-Appellees
[Unpublished]
Minor McNeil appeals the district court's 1 dismissal of his complaint regarding the issuance of a summons to determine his federal income tax liability and the garnishing of his wages to pay past-due taxes. He argues that federal taxation of his wages is unconstitutional and he is a citizen of a “sovereign” state.
The district court determined that McNeil had not identified any applicable waiver of sovereign immunity or any basis for the court's jurisdiction over his claims. After careful review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review).
As to the government's motion for sanctions, we may award “just damages” and single or double costs if we determine that an appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1912; Fed. R. App. P. 38. In this case, we conclude that sanctions are appropriate. See United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256-57 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (rejecting argument that “Free Citizens of the Republic of Minnesota” were not subject to taxation; granting government's motion for sanctions for frivolous appeal).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we grant the government's motion for sanctions in the amount of $8,000. We also deny McNeil's motion for remand.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-2638
Decided: March 02, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)