UNITED STATES v. LEWIS (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-3039

Decided: October 28, 2020

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

David R. Mercer, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Springfield, MO (Laine Cardarella, Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Jamal Lewis, Springfield, MO, pro se. Cynthia J. Hyde, Asst. U.S. Atty., Springfield, MO, for plaintiff-appellee.

[Unpublished]

Jamal Lewis, civilly committed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 since 2012, appeals the district court's ¹ order revoking his most recent grant of conditional release. Because the district court did not clearly err in finding that Lewis failed to comply with his prescribed regimen of psychiatric care and that his continued release would therefore create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another, see 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f), we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. See United States v. Burleson, 29 F. App'x 412, 413 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). We also grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network