KING v. SAUL (2020)

[Unpublished]

Cadero King appeals the district court's ¹ order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find no basis, and King offers none, for reversal. See Nash v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin., 907 F.3d 1086, 1089 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of district court's judgment; upholding Commissioner's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence on record as whole). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.²

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

2.   We agree with the district court that King's filings reflect his misunderstanding of what is required for him to prove that he is disabled and entitled to benefits. Thus, like the district court, we suggest that King would be well advised to seek out an experienced representative to assist him if he intends to reapply for benefits.

PER CURIAM.