THARP v. CITIMORTGAGE INC (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Kevin THARP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

No. 19-3178

Decided: June 05, 2020

Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Tharp, Pro Se Cameron Alexander Lallier, Thomas James Lallier, Foley & Mansfield, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee

[Unpublished]

Kevin Tharp appeals the district court’s ¹ dismissal of his pro se action against CitiMortgage, Inc. Upon careful de novo review, we affirm. We agree that Tharp failed to state a claim regarding interference with his right to redemption, as he did not plead facts sufficient for the court to infer that CitiMortgage was liable for any wrongdoing. See Minn. Stat. § 580.23; Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). We also agree that Tharp’s claims arising under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and his state law claims for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress, were time-barred. See 12 U.S.C. § 2614; Minn. Stat. §§ 541.05, 541.07. Finally, we deny the request in Tharp’s reply brief to supplement the record on appeal. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc., 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network