THARP v. CITIMORTGAGE INC (2020)

[Unpublished]

Kevin Tharp appeals the district court’s ¹ dismissal of his pro se action against CitiMortgage, Inc. Upon careful de novo review, we affirm. We agree that Tharp failed to state a claim regarding interference with his right to redemption, as he did not plead facts sufficient for the court to infer that CitiMortgage was liable for any wrongdoing. See Minn. Stat. § 580.23; Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). We also agree that Tharp’s claims arising under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and his state law claims for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress, were time-barred. See 12 U.S.C. § 2614; Minn. Stat. §§ 541.05, 541.07. Finally, we deny the request in Tharp’s reply brief to supplement the record on appeal. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc., 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.