HUNTSMAN v. 3M COMPANY 3M 3M (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

James Richard HUNTSMAN Plaintiff - Appellant v. 3M COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; 3M Company Employee Retirement Income Plan; Zenith Annette Huntsman; Plan Administrator for the 3M Employee Retirement Income Plan Defendants - Appellees

No. 19-3081

Decided: June 04, 2020

Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

James Richard Huntsman, Pro Se Deborah Ann Ellingboe, Jeffrey Justman, Hannah Mae Leiendecker, Faegre & Drinker, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee 3M Company Employee Retirement Income Plan Bradley C. Eggen, Law Office of Brad C. Eggen, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee Zenith Annette Huntsman Deborah Ann Ellingboe, Jeffrey Justman, Faegre & Drinker, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee Plan Administrator for the 3M Company Employee Retirement Income Plan

[Unpublished]

James Huntsman appeals after the district court ¹ dismissed his action asserting claims related to a series of Minnesota court orders modifying his spousal maintenance obligations. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Newcombe v. United States, 933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network