Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. John Joseph SANFORD, Defendant - Appellant.
[Unpublished]
John Sanford appeals after he pled guilty to a firearm offense and the district court 1 imposed a prison term within the advisory sentencing guideline range. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting that the district court erred in overruling Sanford’s objection to the calculation of his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2), based on his two prior Iowa convictions; denying his request for a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13 (significantly diminished mental capacity); and denying his request for credit for time served.
We conclude that the district court properly calculated the base offense level because Sanford’s prison records established that he was imprisoned on his Iowa convictions within 15 years of the instant offense. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2) & comment. (n.10), 4A1.1(a) & comment. (n.1). We further conclude that the district court correctly determined that the Bureau of Prisons—not the district court—has discretion to credit Sanford for time he had served on related state charges, see United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 112 S.Ct. 1351, 117 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992), and that Sanford was not entitled to credit at sentencing for time he had served on an unrelated charge. We decline to review the district court’s denial of Sanford’s request for a downward departure, as the court considered the request and denied it because Sanford had failed to substantiate his claim of diminished capacity. See United States v. Utlaut, 497 F.3d 843, 845-46 (8th Cir. 2007).
Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues. The clerk’s order of August 19, 2019, treated counsel’s Anders brief as an implicit motion for leave to withdraw. Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel leave to withdraw.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-2481
Decided: February 27, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)