GALARZA SANCHEZ v. BARR (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Eloy GALARZA-SANCHEZ Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States Respondent

No. 19-1967

Decided: February 21, 2020

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Sarah Brenes, The Advocates for Human Rights, Minneapolis, MN, Davida Sheri McGhee, Greene & Espel, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner Peter B. Berg, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Bloomington, MN, Carl H. McIntyre, Margaret Anne O'Donnell, Gregory A. Pennington, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

[Unpublished]

Mexican citizen Eloy Galarza-Sanchez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge, which denied his motion to terminate removal proceedings, and ordered him removed to Mexico. Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court denies the petition because Galarza-Sanchez’s challenge to the agency’s jurisdiction over his removal proceedings is foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See Ali v. Barr, 924 F.3d 983, 986 (8th Cir. 2019).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network