UNITED STATES v. DOTSTRY (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kendrick DOTSTRY Defendant - Appellant

No. 19-2020

Decided: February 06, 2020

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

David J. MacLaughlin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Andrew Tweeten, Assistant United States Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff - Appellee Kendrick Dotstry, Pro Se

[Unpublished]

Kendrick Dotstry appeals the district court’s ¹ denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Upon careful review of the record, including the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, we conclude there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of post-judgment relief. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (court reviews denial of Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion; Rule 60(b) authorizes relief in only most exceptional cases). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law