Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jacquell LOWE Defendant - Appellant
[Unpublished]
Jacquell Lowe appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense pursuant to a plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging whether the district court properly considered the policy disagreements that exist among district courts regarding methamphetamine sentencing guidelines and suggesting that the sentence is unreasonable. Lowe has filed a supplemental brief asserting that counsel was ineffective and reiterating the claim regarding policy disagreements.
We decline, at this time, to consider ineffective-assistance issues. See United States v. Woods, 717 F.3d 654, 657 (8th Cir. 2013) (stating that ineffective-assistance claims are usually best litigated in collateral proceedings, and this court considers such claims on direct appeal only if the record has been fully developed, counsel’s error is readily apparent, or to not act would amount to plain miscarriage of justice). As to the remaining issues, we enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (stating that this court reviews de novo the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (stating that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice).
Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, grant counsel leave to withdraw, and deny Lowe’s motion for appointment of new counsel.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Court Judge for the District of North Dakota.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-2585
Decided: January 28, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)