CIPRIANO CHACON v. BARR (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Tereso De Jesus CIPRIANO-CHACON Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General of United States Respondent

No. 19-2453

Decided: January 17, 2020

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

Malvern Burnett, Law Offices of Malvern C. Burnett, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner Carl H. McIntyre, Sherry Denise Soanes, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

[Unpublished]

Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied his application for cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to prove that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We have no jurisdiction to review this discretionary determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I); Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir. 2007). As Cipriano-Chacon has not raised a cognizable constitutional or legal challenge to that determination, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Perez v. Holder, 569 F.3d 370, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network