Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lamont WILLIAMSON Plaintiff - Appellant v. CORIZON, INC.; Ian Wallace Defendants Mina Massey Defendant - Appellee Dana Degen; John Doe, Nurse; Jane Doe, Nurse Defendants
[Unpublished]
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Missouri inmate Lamont Williamson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his deliberate indifference claim against Dr. Mina Massey. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to Williamson, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, this court concludes that the grant of summary judgment was warranted. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Specifically, this court agrees with the district court that even assuming Williamson’s nasal problems, including nosebleeds, qualified as objectively serious medical needs, the record did not establish that Dr. Massey was deliberately indifferent to those needs. See Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771-72 (8th Cir. 2015) (to prevail on deliberate indifference claim, inmate must show mental state similar to criminal negligence: defendant disregarded known risk to inmate’s health); Fourte v. Faulkner Cty., Ark., 746 F.3d 384, 389 (8th Cir. 2014) (showing that another doctor might have ordered different treatment or tests did not equate to showing deliberate indifference, as physicians are entitled to exercise their own medical judgment). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1898
Decided: January 14, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)