OJEDA HERNANDEZ v. BARR (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Samuel OJEDA-HERNANDEZ Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States Respondent

No. 18-3331

Decided: December 11, 2019

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

Gloria Contreras Edin, Nicholas Ratkowski, Contreras & Metelska, Saint Paul, MN, for Petitioner Peter B. Berg, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Bloomington, MN, Giovanni Di Maggio, Carl H. McIntyre, Keith Ian McManus, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

[Unpublished]

Samuel Ojeda-Hernandez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his interlocutory appeal from the decision of an immigration judge denying his motion to terminate removal proceedings. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments, this court grants respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C.§ 1252(a)(1); Camick v. Sessions, 891 F.3d 1101, 1106 (8th Cir. 2018).

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for review is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network