UNITED STATES v. REEDER (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl S. REEDER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-2436

Decided: November 26, 2019

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

Anita L. Burns, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO (Laine Cardarella, Fed. Public Defender, on the brief), for appellant. Alison D. Dunning, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.

[Unpublished]

Carl Reeder appeals the judgment of the district court ¹ revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to seven months in prison and two years of supervised release, with additional special conditions which Reeder has not challenged.

Following careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v. McGhee, 869 F.3d 703, 705-06 (8th Cir. 2017) (per curiam). There is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

We affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel leave to withdraw.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network