Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kallys ALBERT, Sr. Plaintiff-Appellant v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; John Doe Defendants-Appellees
Kallys Albert, Sr., appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and state law claims. Having carefully conducted a de novo review of the record and arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the section 1981 claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. See Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 848-49 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). We further conclude that the district court properly dismissed the remaining state law claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) because Albert failed to meet his burden of proving the amount in controversy by a preponderance of the evidence. See Branson Label, Inc. v. City of Branson, Mo., 793 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review); see also Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vein Centers for Excellence, Inc., 912 F.3d 1076, 1080-81 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding that when defendant challenges plaintiff’s allegations, plaintiff must prove, by preponderance of evidence, that amount in controversy did not appear to legal certainty to be less than $75,000). The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Albert’s state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims if court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction); Labickas v. Ark. State Univ., 78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (following dismissal of federal claims, court may dismiss state-law claims without prejudice).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Elizabeth Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1738
Decided: November 26, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)