Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Timothy WATKINS Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARKANSAS, State of; Keith Rhodes, Individually Defendants Brad Perkins, Individually Defendant-Appellee Hazen District Court; Billy's Trucking; David Smith, Individually Defendants
[Unpublished]
Timothy Watkins appeals following the district court’s 1 judgment on an adverse jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Watkins’s challenges to prior decisions of this court are precluded under the law-of-the-case doctrine. See Thompson v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 821 F.3d 1008, 1011 (8th Cir. 2016) (reiterating the principle that “when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages of the same case.”). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1866
Decided: November 04, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)