DANIEL v. BARR (2019)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Onesmus Bogonko DANIEL Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States Respondent

No. 19-1236

Decided: November 05, 2019

Onesmus Bogonko Daniel, Pro Se Peter B. Berg, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Bloomington, MN, Jennifer Parker Levings, Senior Litigation Counsel, Carl H. McIntyre, Lisa Morinelli, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

[Unpublished]

Kenyan citizen Onesmus Daniel petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decisions of an immigration judge, which granted the Department of Homeland Security’s motion to reconsider a decision to terminate removal proceedings, and denied him cancellation of removal.¹ Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and after careful consideration of the petition, this court finds no basis for reversal.

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The agency’s remaining findings — including the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and voluntary departure—are not before this panel. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (claim not raised in opening brief is waived).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law