HURLBUT v. Deputy Josve Velasco; Deputy Skinkis; Deputy Uriel Paredes Defendants - Appellees (2019)

[Unpublished]

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, former inmate Daniel Bryce Hurlbut appeals the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the record and all reasonable inferences in Hurlbut’s favor, see Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771 (8th Cir. 2015) (de novo review), we find no error in the district court’s thorough analysis of Hurlbut’s claims.² The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

2.   We lack jurisdiction to consider Hurlbut’s challenges to a magistrate judge’s adverse rulings on nondispositive pretrial matters, because he did not timely object to those orders below. See Daley v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., 415 F.3d 889, 893 n.9 (8th Cir. 2005) (when parties do not consent to final disposition by magistrate, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider direct appeal of magistrate’s order on nondispositive pretrial matter).

PER CURIAM.