FORD v. FERRELL ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC (2019)

[Unpublished]

Damien Ford appeals the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment on his retaliatory-discipline claim. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo; stating that “a defendant may successfully defend a retaliatory discipline claim by showing ‘some evidence’ the inmate actually committed a rule violation” (quoting Goff v. Burton, 7 F.3d 734, 738-39 (8th Cir. 1993))); Goff, 7 F.3d at 736-38 (stating that, to succeed on a retaliatory-discipline claim, an inmate must prove that, but for an unconstitutional retaliatory motive, the discipline would not have occurred); see also Morstad v. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 147 F.3d 741, 743-44 (8th Cir. 1998) (recognizing that the Eleventh Amendment bars 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a state and its officials acting in their official capacities). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

PER CURIAM.