Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Joshua R. BERRYHILL, Defendant - Appellant.
[Unpublished]
Joshua Berryhill pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). At sentencing, the district court 1 determined a base offense level of 20 because Berryhill committed the instant offense after “sustaining one felony conviction of ․ a crime of violence.” USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). The court concluded that either of Berryhill’s two prior Missouri felony convictions—second-degree robbery, in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 569.030, or armed criminal action, in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 571.015—qualified as a “crime of violence.” See USSG § 4B1.2(a). After calculating an advisory guideline range of 51 to 63 months’ imprisonment, the court varied downward from the range and sentenced Berryhill to 48 months’ imprisonment.
Berryhill appeals, arguing that the court committed procedural error by finding that he had sustained a previous conviction for a crime of violence. We have since held, however, that Missouri second-degree robbery is indeed a crime of violence under the sentencing guidelines, United States v. Parker, 929 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2019), so Berryhill’s contention is foreclosed by circuit precedent. The district court did not err in calculating the advisory guideline range.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-3055
Decided: August 13, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)