Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jonathan ALEXANDER Defendant-Appellant
[Unpublished]
Jonathan Alexander pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). At sentencing, the district court 1 increased Alexander’s base offense level because his prior conviction for robbery in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-12-102 was “a crime of violence.” See USSG § 2K2.1(a)(3). This resulted in an advisory guidelines range of 78 to 97 months in prison. Alexander appeals his 78-month sentence, arguing his Arkansas robbery conviction is not a crime of violence under the Guidelines.
“The term ‘crime of violence’ means any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that -- (1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or (2) is ․ robbery.” USSG § 4B1.2(a), incorporated by reference in § 2K2.1, comment. (n.1). Alexander argues that Arkansas robbery is not a crime of violence under § 4B1.2(a) because (1) the degree of physical force required to commit the offense does not rise to the level of force required by the force clause, § 4B1.2(a)(1), and (2) the elements of Arkansas robbery “sweep more broadly” than the elements of the enumerated offense of generic robbery in § 4B1.2(a)(2).
In United States v. Stovall, 921 F.3d 758, 760 (8th Cir. 2019), we held that “Arkansas robbery has the same elements as the generic definition of robbery.” In United States v. Smith, 928 F.3d 714 (8th Cir. 2019), applying Stokeling v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 139 S. Ct. 544, 202 L.Ed.2d 512 (2019), we held that Arkansas robbery requires sufficient force to overcome a victim’s resistance; therefore it is a crime of violence under both the force clause and the enumerated offense clause of USSG § 4B1.2. 928 F.3d 714, 716-17. We are bound by these recent, controlling decisions. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-3240
Decided: July 30, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)