Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maxim V. KUKLIN Plaintiff-Appellant v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA; Thomas J. Anderson, individually and in his official capacity; Richard B. Beeson, individually and in his official capacity; Mary Benner, individually and in her official capacity; Linda A. Cohen, individually and in her official capacity; Shawn Curley, individually and in his official capacity; Elizabeth Davis, individually and in her official capacity; Karen Hanson, individually and in her official capacity; Michael D. Hsu, individually and in his official capacity; Dean E. Johnson, individually and in his official capacity; Aseem Kaul, individually and in his official capacity; Scott Lanyon, individually and in his official capacity; Peggy E. Lucas, individually and in her official capacity; David J. McMillan, individually and in his official capacity; Abdul M. Omari, individually and in his official capacity; Kendall J. Powell, individually and in his official capacity; Joseph Ritter, individually and in his official capacity; Darrin M. Rosha, individually and in his official capacity; Harry Sapienza, individually and in his official capacity; Myles Shaver, individually and in his official capacity; Patricia S. Simmons, individually and in her official capacity; Steven A. Sviggum, individually and in his official capacity; Paul Vaaler, individually and in his official capacity; Joel Waldfogel, individually and in his official capacity; Shaker A. Zahra, individually and in his official capacity Defendants-Appellees
[Unpublished]
Maxim Kuklin appeals following the district court’s 1 dismissal with prejudice of his pro se civil action related to his termination from a graduate program at the University of Minnesota. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See Montin v. Moore, 846 F.3d 289, 292 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(6) dismissal de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Katherine M. Menendez, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-3147
Decided: July 05, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)