Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Corey Dean FRASHER Defendant-Appellant
[Unpublished]
Corey Frasher pleaded guilty to sexual exploitation of a child, 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), (e), and being a felon in possession of firearms, id. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). As part of his plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal unless, as relevant here, his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum. The district court 1 imposed a total sentence of 420 months in prison, which included 360 months on the sexual-exploitation count and 60 months on the firearm-possession count. Neither sentence exceeded the statutory maximum. See id. §§ 924(a)(2), 2251(e). In an Anders brief, Frasher’s counsel suggests that the total sentence is substantively unreasonable and requests permission to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable and that it is applicable to the issue raised on appeal. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-3353
Decided: June 28, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)