Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John Joseph DOUGLAS Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America Respondent-Appellee
[Unpublished]
John Douglas was found guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and he was sentenced to 240 months in prison. His sentence was enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (felon in possession who has three prior convictions for “violent felony” shall be imprisoned not less than 15 years). Douglas later filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his sentence as an armed career criminal. The motion was denied, based in part on the district court’s 1 conclusion that Douglas’s two prior Minnesota convictions for first-degree aggravated robbery qualified as “violent felon[ies]” for purposes of section 924(e). The district court then granted Douglas a certificate of appealability regarding that conclusion, and he appeals.
After careful de novo review, we conclude that Douglas’s prior convictions were properly classified as “violent felon[ies].” See United States v. Libby, 880 F.3d 1011, 1013, 1016 (8th Cir. 2018) (by its terms, first-degree aggravated robbery under Minnesota law minimally requires that defendant communicate threat of violent force; as such, elements of offense categorically present “violent felony”); see also United States v. Salean, 583 F.3d 1059, 1060 n.2 (8th Cir. 2009) (for purposes of determining whether prior conviction qualified as “violent felony,” it was irrelevant that prior conviction was premised on aiding-and-abetting theory of liability). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-3422
Decided: March 11, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)