JACKSON v. TARGET CORPORATION 10 XYZ (2019)

[Unpublished]

In this diversity action, Arkansas resident Cynthia Jackson appeals the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment on her negligence claim. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards, 795 F.3d 832, 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); see also Harvey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 33 F.3d 969, 971 (8th Cir. 1994) (discussing the showing required in slip-and-fall cases under Arkansas law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

PER CURIAM.