Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Pete PANE Defendant - Appellant
[Unpublished]
Pete Pane pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute, 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1); id. § 846. As part of his plea agreement, Pane waived the right to appeal except to raise ineffective assistance of counsel. The presentence investigation report determined that Pane was a career offender because he had two previous felony drug convictions and recommended an advisory Guidelines range of 188–235 months in prison. See 18 U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. The district court 1 imposed a sentence of 188 months. Pane’s counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has asked to withdraw. The Anders brief challenges the career-offender finding and claims that it overstates the seriousness of Pane’s past criminal conduct. The brief also addresses the overall reasonableness of Pane’s sentence. Pane has filed a pro se brief raising similar arguments.
We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable and that it is applicable to each of the issues Pane and his counsel have raised. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant counsel permission to withdraw.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-2144
Decided: January 30, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)