FRAZIER v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF ARKANSAS (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Donald R. FRAZIER, also known as Donald Muhammad Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS, A public body corporate; Mike Sweeney; Matthew Henry; Jeff Hubanks, Chief Individually and his Official Capacity Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-2832

Decided: August 13, 2018

Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

Donald R. Frazier, Pro Se Jenna Allison Adams, Arkansas Municipal League, Legal, North Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees Matthew Henry, Pro Se

[Unpublished]

Donald Frazier appeals after the district court ¹ adversely granted summary judgment in his civil rights action.

Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that, as to the issues raised on appeal, summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); see also Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481 F.3d 630, 638 (8th Cir. 2007) (stating that points not meaningfully argued on appeal were waived). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law