Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Shawn Jerome VAASSEN Defendant-Appellant
(Unpublished)
After Shawn Vaassen pled guilty to wire fraud and firearms offenses, the parties stipulated to an upward departure under U.S.S.G. §§ 5K2.0(a)(3) (departure based on circumstances not otherwise adequately taken into consideration), 5K2.2 (physical injury), and 5K2.6 (weapon possessed or used in commission of offense); and the government moved for a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 (substantial assistance to authorities). After accepting the departures, the district court 1 sentenced Vassen to a prison term within the resulting Guidelines range. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence was substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions); United States v. Dalton, 478 F.3d 879, 881 (8th Cir. 2007) (extent of downward departure for substantial assistance lies within district court’s discretion and is virtually unreviewable on appeal). Additionally, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-1047
Decided: August 02, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)