ROGERS v. BROUK (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Corey Jemell ROGERS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Steven BROUK; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-2912

Decided: July 17, 2018

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Corey Jemell Rogers, Pro Se Katherine S. Walsh, Attorney General's Office, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees

[Unpublished]

Corey Rogers appeals following the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he raises claims of excessive force, deliberate indifference to his medical needs, and sexual assault.

After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo; viewing record in light most favorable to nonmoving party). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law