HAYNES v. WAGONER III (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Victoria L. HAYNES Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jack WAGONER, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A. Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-2320

Decided: June 04, 2018

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Victoria L. Haynes, Pro Se Edwin L. Lowther, Jr., Gary D. Marts, Jr., Wright & Lindsey, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees

[Unpublished]

Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s ¹ dismissal of her diversity legal malpractice action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Upon de novo review, see Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. FDIC, 708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review for dismissal based on failure to state claim); Sloan v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., 368 F.3d 853, 854 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review for district court’s application of state law in diversity case), we agree that the action is time-barred. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law