Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tynisha Latrice REINERIO, now known as Akosua Tanisha Aaebo Plaintiff-Appellant v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A.; Countrywide Financial Corporation; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; CWAB, Inc.; Bank of New York Mellon; Southlaw P.C. Defendants - Appellees
[Unpublished]
Akosua Tanisha Aaebo, formerly known as Tynisha Latrice Reinerio, appeals from the order of the District Court 1 dismissing her claims as barred by res judicata and denying her motion to remand. She has also filed a motion in this Court for judicial notice.
After de novo review, we conclude that the District Court did not err in dismissing Aaebo’s claims. See C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano, 695 F.3d 758, 763–64 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); see also Chesterfield Vill., Inc. v. City of Chesterfield, 64 S.W.3d 315, 318–20 (Mo. 2002) (applying the Missouri common-law doctrine of claim preclusion); U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 943 S.W.2d 640, 642 (Mo. 1997) (“The granting of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is a final judgment on the merits sufficient to raise the defense of res judicata in a later proceeding.”). We further conclude that the District Court did not err in denying Aaebo’s motion to remand. See Block v. Toyota Motor Corp., 665 F.3d 944, 947–48 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo the denial of a motion to remand and explaining the fraudulent joinder standard).
We affirm the judgment of the District Court and deny Aaebo’s pending motion.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-3120
Decided: June 06, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)