CHESTANG v. SIMPSON (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

KeOndra M. CHESTANG Plaintiff-Appellant v. Missally S. SIMPSON, Correctional Officer, Varner SuperMax, originally named as Simpson, then Christy Simpson; Aleeshia Quinones, Nurse, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Aleshia Quinones); Teri Kennedy, Director of Nursing, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Kennedy); Lesa Jones, Assistant Director of Nursing, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Jones); Rory Griffin, Medical Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Humphries, Owner, Correct Care Solutions (originally named as Humphrey); David Quillen, Sergeant, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Quillen); Ojiugo Iko, Doctor, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Iko) Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-1844

Decided: May 30, 2018

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

KeOndra M. Chestang, Pro Se Michael Cantrell, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General's Office, Civil Litigation, Little Rock, AR, Defendants-Appellees Missally S. Simpson, Rory Griffin, David Quillen Michelle Banks Odum, Humphries & Odum, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees Aleeshia Quinones, Teri Kennedy, Lesa Jones, Ojiugo Iko

[Unpublished]

Arkansas inmate KeOndra M. Chestang appeals the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the summary judgment record, see Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review), we find no basis for overturning the district court’s thoughtful analysis of his claims of deliberate indifference.² The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2. The new claims Chestang mentions are not properly before this court. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network