Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jerry L. DONALDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, The, Defendant-Appellee
In this diversity action, Jerry Donaldson appeals the adverse summary judgment decision issued by the district court in favor of Kansas City Southern Railway (Southern) as to Donaldson's claim that Southern negligently maintained the roadway at a crossing where its three tracks intersected a state highway.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Donaldson, we conclude that he established a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Southern negligently maintained the pavement. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards, 795 F.3d 832, 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015); Depositors Ins. Co. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 506 F.3d 1092, 1094 (8th Cir. 2007). While Ark. Code Ann. § 27-67-214(b) limits Southern's liability to maintain “that part of the roadway between [its] tracks and to the end of the cross ties on each side,” the case law interpreting the statute does not clearly indicate whether the area between the cross ties is covered. Cf. Untiedt v. St. Louis Sw. Ry. Co., 246 Ark. 941, 440 S.W.2d 251, 255 (Ark. 1969) (noting the duty of railroad company to maintain roadway is limited to portion of roadway between its tracks and to end of cross ties on each side). The district court may need to predict how the Arkansas Supreme Court would interpret the statute. See Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co., 994 F.2d 1295, 1301 (8th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we reverse the district court's summary judgment decision, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-2039
Decided: April 26, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)