Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Kelly CONWELL Defendant-Appellant
[Unpublished]
Kelly Conwell, who was found incompetent to stand trial under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) on charges involving threatening government employees, appeals the district court's 1 order civilly committing him under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, which provides for the hospitalization of a person who is found—by clear and convincing evidence after a hearing—to be suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676 (8th Cir. 2002). Conwell challenges the sufficiency of the evidence justifying his commitment.
Having reviewed for clear error the district court's factual determinations, see id., we affirm. Specifically, the district court's commitment order is supported by the opinions of the mental health experts who assessed Conwell at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri—where he is presently confined for treatment—and the opinion of the independent psychological examiner that Conwell is suffering from a serious mental illness such that he meets the criteria for § 4246 commitment, in part because of his history of assaultive behaviors, his social isolation, his past alcohol and drug use, his failure to take medications for three years prior to his most recent offense, and his continuing delusions about a plan by the government to retaliate against him despite medication compliance. See, 299 F.3d at 677–78; Williams United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (listing suggested factors in determining potential dangerousness). We note that the Attorney General must continue its efforts to place Conwell in a suitable state facility and prepare annual reports concerning his condition and the need for continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 4246(d), 4247(e)(1)(B).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-2329
Decided: March 21, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)