Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Frederick L. PITCHFORD Plaintiff-Appellant v. Joseph BOECKMANN; Fred Thorne; David Henry Lofton; Jerry Eaves Defendants-Appellees
[Unpublished]
Frederick L. Pitchford appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal, without prejudice, of his pro se complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Upon de novo review of Pitchford’s appellate arguments and the district court record, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) is reviewed de novo).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-2504
Decided: February 28, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)