Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jamie Shawn McCall Plaintiff - Appellant v. Shock, Sheriff, Faulkner County, et al. Defendants - Appellees
Arkansas inmate Jamie McCall appeals the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 official and individual capacity claims against Faulkner County officials that he was exposed to various unconstitutional conditions of confinement at the Faulkner County Detention Center. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude, for the reasons explained by the district court, that the court did not err in granting summary judgment. See LaCross v. City of Duluth, 713 F.3d 1155, 1157 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Regarding McCall's official capacity housing conditions claim, we have considered only the January and May 2014 occasions when McCall claims he was housed in a booking cell at the FCDC under unconstitutionally unsanitary conditions, because those were the only occasions alleged in his complaint. McCall alleged he was subject to the unsanitary conditions on other occasions in his preliminary injunction, summary judgment, and appellate pleadings, but he did not file a motion to amend his complaint. Should McCall file a motion in the district court for leave to file an amended complaint asserting an official capacity housing conditions claim that includes those additional occasions, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) and 60(b), we take no position on whether the district court should grant such a motion, or whether McCall would be entitled to relief if the additional incidents are considered.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-3285
Decided: July 28, 2016
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)