CURRAN v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK (2006)

United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit.

S. Keith CURRAN; Rhonda Curran, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., Appellee.

No. 06-1911.

Decided: December 18, 2006

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Robert L. Depper, Jr., Depper Law Firm, Eldorado, AR, Donald Richard Jones, Richard Wilensky, Wilensky & Jones, Patrick J. Mulligan, Eric N. Roberson, Jason H. Fox, Reid Stewart, Law Offices of Patrick J. Mulligan, Dallas, TX, for appellants. Elizabeth Robben Murray, Kevin Arlen Crass, Friday & Eldredge, Little Rock, AR, Marc D. Sokol, Matthew M. Neumeier, Scott T. Schutte, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for appellee.

The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court ¹ in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.

Affirmed.

FOOTNOTES

1. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law