Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Phillip LAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Order
Phillip Lay’s application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act was rejected administratively, with review culminating in an adverse decision by an administrative law judge. The dispute moved to district court, where the parties agreed to have a magistrate judge make the final decision. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The magistrate judge concluded that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not reflect a material legal error. 2019 U.S. Dist. Lexis 41780 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 14, 2019). We substantially agree with the magistrate judge’s analysis, and on that basis the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
Young B. Kim, Magistrate Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-1893
Decided: January 29, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)