Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis M. FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shane Sahm, Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has answered the question of state law that this court certified to it. United States v. Franklin, 928 N.W.2d 545 (Wis. 2019). Burglary under Wisconsin law, Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1m), applies to burglaries of vehicles as well as buildings and dwellings. That means the state crime is broader than the federal generic crime of burglary that may serve as a predicate for enhanced offenses under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). See Mathis v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S. Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016) (Iowa burglary statute broader than federal generic burglary because it applies to burglaries of vehicles). In response to our request, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin has decided definitively that the state crime is not “divisible” among different locations for purposes of applying the Armed Career Criminal Act. As a result, the prior Wisconsin burglary convictions of defendants-appellants Dennis Franklin and Shane Sahm do not qualify as prior convictions for “violent felonies” to support their federal sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The parties have submitted statements of position under Circuit Rule 52. They and we agree on the next step. The federal sentences for both Franklin and Sahm in these appeals are hereby VACATED and their cases are REMANDED to the district court for resentencing without applying the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-1580, No. 16-1872
Decided: July 02, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)