Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ABS GLOBAL, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant - Appellee, Genus PLC Counterclaim Defendant - Appellee v. INGURAN, LLC, doing business as Sexing Technologies, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff - Appellant XY, LLC, Intervening Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff – Appellant.
ORDER
This appeal concerns the award of attorneys’ fees to ABS Global, Inc., and Genus for their partially successful federal antitrust claim against Inguran, LLC (known as Sexing Technologies). The antitrust claim did not stand alone, however; the case also involved counterclaims brought by Sexing Technologies against ABS and Genus for patent infringement and breach of a contract that protected ST's trade secrets. In ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC, 914 F.3d 1054, 1059 (7th Cir. 2019), reh'g denied (Feb. 28, 2019), we addressed the patent and contract claims; the antitrust claim was not part of the appeal. We concluded that the jury's verdict with respect to two of the patent claims had to be set aside, and so we remanded for further proceedings on that aspect of the case.
While the appeal was underway, the district court awarded substantial attorneys’ fees to ABS and Genus on the antitrust claims; it also awarded costs to Sexing Technologies. The antitrust fee award is the subject of the current appeal. Because the antitrust and patent aspects of this case are closely interlinked, however, we conclude that it would be premature to rule on the fees each side should bear. We therefore VACATE the district court's decision regarding attorney's fees and costs, dkt. 873, and REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings. We express no opinion on the way in which the district court ultimately must balance each party's success or failure on different parts of the case.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-3317
Decided: June 04, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)