UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deangelo ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-3112

Decided: May 16, 2018

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

Benjamin W. Proctor, Attorney, Kelly B. Watzka, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee Christopher D. Donovan, Attorney, Pruhs & Donovan, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellant

ORDER

Deangelo Anderson filed an appeal from his conviction and sentence, and on February 2, 2018 we upheld his conviction but ordered a limited remand as to his sentence so that the district court could determine whether it would have imposed the same sentence knowing that it could consider the mandatory sentence in light of Dean v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 1170, 197 L.Ed.2d 490 (2017). The district court responded that it would have imposed the same sentence, and we provided the parties an opportunity to respond. On May 9, 2018, the parties filed a joint statement agreeing that Anderson’s argument regarding Dean has been resolved and stating that, because we had already rejected Anderson’s other arguments, the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. We agree.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law