Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tanya V. SVOBODA and Antonella M. Ortiz Colosi, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMAZON.COM and Amazon.com Services, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.
ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, no judge 1 in active service requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc and all members of the original panel have voted to deny rehearing and to issue an amended opinion. We added the following language on page 17: “The district court was also on solid ground in observing that it retained discretion on a finding of liability to award damages on a classwide basis by, for example, assessing the amount of damages on a common per-scan basis.” The court's opinion dated December 17, 2025, is amended in a separately filed opinion released today.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Judge St. Eve, Judge Lee, and Judge Kolar did not participate in the consideration of this petition.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 25-1361
Decided: March 06, 2026
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)