Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rodolfo A. CUELLAR, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Rodolfo A. Cuellar, Jr., federal prisoner # 25755-077, was found guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine, using a communication facility to facilitate drug trafficking, possessing heroin with intent to distribute, and employing a person under 18 years of age in the distribution of cocaine and heroin. He is serving 40 years in prison. Cuellar moved for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act. The district court denied Cuellar's motion because he had not been convicted of an offense to which Section 404 applies. Cuellar has appealed.
Generally, we review a district court's discretionary denial of relief under Section 404 of the First Step Act for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 320 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2699, 206 L.Ed.2d 839 (2020). Because the denial in this case turns on the meaning of a federal statute, we apply de novo review. Id. The record and Cuellar's motion reflect that he had not been convicted of any offense that was the “violation of a Federal criminal statute, the statutory penalties for which were modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.” First Step Act, § 404(a), Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018); see also Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. 260, 269, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying Cuellar's motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. The Government's alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED as unnecessary. Cuellar's motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
Per Curiam:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-10182
Decided: August 16, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)