Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jamie SMITH, Defendant—Appellee.
In 2002, a jury convicted Jamie Smith of conspiring to possess, with intent to distribute, five kilograms or more of powder cocaine, 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was sentenced to, inter alia, a within-Sentencing Guidelines term of 360-months’ imprisonment.
Smith moved in 2018 to reduce his sentence pursuant to the First Step Act, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018). The district court granted Smith's request, concluding Smith was eligible for relief under the First Step Act and ordering his sentence be reduced to 300-months’ imprisonment.
The Government contends Smith's conviction was not a “covered offense” under the First Step Act because it included both crack cocaine and powder cocaine, and the drug-quantity thresholds for powder cocaine were not modified by the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act. We generally review for abuse of discretion the decision to reduce a sentence pursuant to the First Step Act; questions of law, such as the court's determination turning on the meaning of a federal statute, are reviewed de novo. United States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2699, 206 L.Ed.2d 839 (2020).
Our court recently held dual-object conspiracies, i.e. drug conspiracies involving both powder and crack cocaine, qualify as covered offenses under the First Step Act because the “statutory penalties for the crack-cocaine object were modified by Section 2 of the Fair Sentencing Act”. United States v. Winters, 986 F.3d 942, 950 (5th Cir. 2021); see Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-220, § 2(a), 124 Stat. 2372, 2372 (2010). Smith's conspiracy offense was committed before August 3, 2010, and is, therefore, a covered offense under the First Step Act.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
Per Curiam:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-30136
Decided: April 05, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)