Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Josue CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant
Josue Cruz, federal prisoner # 50704-177, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance and was sentenced to 135 months of imprisonment, four years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. He appeals the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 794. See U.S.S.G. app. C, amend. 794 (Supp. Nov. 1, 2015). He contends that he was entitled to a minor role reduction under Amendment 794 because he played an insignificant role in the conspiracy, he had little decision-making authority, he did not gain much financially from the transaction, and according to the Presentence Report, he was not an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor.
Amendment 794, which became effective on November 1, 2015, revised the commentary to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 by adding a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in determining whether a defendant is entitled to a minor or minimal role offense level reduction. See United States v. Gomez-Valle, 828 F.3d 324, 328-29 & n.17 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing U.S.S.G. app. C, amend. 794, at 116-18 (Supp. Nov. 1, 2015)); see also § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(C)(i)-(v)). It is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d), p.s., and, therefore, it is not retroactively applicable for purposes of § 3582(c)(2). See § 1B1.10(d). The district court also correctly noted that Amendment 794 was already in effect at the time of Cruz's sentencing in 2016. Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cruz's § 3582(c)(2) motion. See United States v. Guerrero, 870 F.3d 395, 396 (5th Cir. 2017).
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-11182
Decided: August 14, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)