Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Farhan AWAN, Petitioner-Appellant v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee
Farhan Awan, Texas prisoner # 2092220, filed a federal habeas application in the district court challenging his conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a child. Awan moved the district court for release pending disposition of his habeas application, asserting that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to strike a biased juror and complaining of dangerous prison conditions resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. The motion was denied, and this interlocutory appeal ensued.
For release pending disposition of his federal habeas application, Awan must “raise[ ] substantial constitutional claims upon which he has a high probability of success,” and he must show that “extraordinary or exceptional circumstances exist which make the grant of bail necessary to make the habeas remedy effective.” Calley v. Callaway, 496 F.2d 701, 702 (5th Cir. 1974); see also Watson v. Goodwin, 709 F. App'x 311, 312 (5th Cir. 2018) (applying Calley to appeal of denial of bail in a federal habeas proceeding based upon a state conviction). Considering the deferential standard of review applicable in this habeas case, Awan has not shown that his ineffective assistance claim has a high probability of success. See id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The district court's order is AFFIRMED. This decision neither makes nor intimates any determination with regard to the merits of Awan's habeas application. To the extent that Awan also moves this court for release pending decision in his habeas case, the motion is DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-10413
Decided: May 26, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)