Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Teresita ARRAMBIDE, Defendant-Appellant
Teresita Arrambide, federal prisoner # 21145-479, was convicted of conspiring to commit money laundering, and she was sentenced to 30 months of imprisonment. Without holding the evidentiary hearing that Arrambide requested, the district court denied her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the merits. Arrambide now requests a certificate of appealability (COA).
To obtain a COA, a petitioner must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). Arrambide argues that trial counsel gave her bad sentencing advice, inducing her guilty plea with an incorrect estimation of her likely sentence, and that trial counsel should have sought a reduction in her offense level because she played only a minor role in the offense. Arrambide has not made the required showing to obtain a COA on these claims. See Slack, 529 U.S. at 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We do not consider her arguments, raised for the first time in her COA brief, that counsel should have moved for a downward departure based on her cultural assimilation under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 and under U.S.S.G. § 5H1.6 because she has two minor children in her care. See Black v. Davis, 902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, No. 18-9645, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 859, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––, 2020 WL 129541 (U.S. Jan. 13, 2020). Arrambide’s motion for a COA is therefore denied.
We construe Arrambide’s motion for a COA with respect to the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing as a direct appeal of that issue, see Norman v. Stephens, 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016), and affirm. Arrambide’s request that this court conduct an evidentiary hearing is denied.
COA DENIED; AFFIRMED; EVIDENTIARY HEARING DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-50154
Decided: February 28, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)