UNITED STATES v. LAROCK (2019)

Gary E. Larock, Jr., pleaded true to violating the terms of his supervised release from his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, and the district court sentenced him to 24 months of imprisonment and a 180-month term of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the district court plainly erred by imposing, without explanation, a standard condition of supervised release requiring that he “permit a probation officer to visit [him] at any time at home or elsewhere and permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer.”

As Larock concedes, our review is for plain error only. See United States v. Salazar, 743 F.3d 445, 448 (5th Cir. 2014). We recently rejected materially indistinguishable arguments on plain error review. See United States v. Cabello, 916 F.3d 543, 544 (5th Cir. 2019). Thus, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.  

PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.