Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher Andrew WILSON, also known as Wiggy, Defendant-Appellant
Christopher Andrew Wilson, federal prisoner # 18729-380, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. In so doing, Wilson challenges the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
Under the preamendment Guidelines, Wilson’s attributable drug quantity of 29.34 kilograms of crack cocaine resulted in a base offense level of 38, a total offense level of 40, and an advisory sentence range of 360 months to life. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2013). Although Amendment 782 provides a basis for reducing a prisoner’s sentence under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d), p.s., possession of at least 25.2 kilograms of crack cocaine still yields a base offense level of 38. See U.S.S.G. App. C, amend. 782; § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2018). Thus, leaving all other guideline application decisions unaffected, see § 1B1.10(b)(1), p.s., Wilson’s total offense level remains 40, and his advisory guidelines range remains 360 years to life, see U.S.S.G. Ch.5, Pt.A (Sentencing Table). Consequently, Amendment 782 “does not have the effect of lowering [Wilson’s] applicable guideline range,” and he is not entitled to a reduction of his sentence under § 3582(c)(2). § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B), p.s.
Because there is no nonfrivolous argument that the denial of Wilson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion was error, the motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, and Wilson’s appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM:* FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-50822
Decided: May 21, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)