Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Charles Cleveland NOWDEN, Defendant-Appellant
Charles Cleveland Nowden, former federal prisoner # 29172-077 and current Texas prisoner # 01780278, was convicted in 2001 of possessing contraband cigarettes and being a felon in possession of a firearm, and he was sentenced to concurrent 16-month terms of imprisonment. He appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of coram nobis, which he filed seeking to vacate and set aside his convictions and sentences.
Nowden reiterates the arguments raised and rejected in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and also argues that the cigarettes did not travel in interstate commerce when he stole them, which seems to expand on the argument raised in his § 2255 motion that the cigarettes were not contraband. He provides no reasons for his failure to raise this latter claim in his § 2255 motion or explain why no other remedy was available. Nowden is not entitled to coram nobis relief if he merely regurgitates the claims he already raised in his § 2255 motion or raises claims that could have been raised in that motion. See United States v. Esogbue, 357 F.3d 532, 535 (5th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, Nowden has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. See Santos-Sanchez v. United States, 548 F.3d 327, 330 (5th Cir. 2008), vacated on other grounds, 559 U.S. 1046, 130 S.Ct. 2340, 176 L.Ed.2d 559 (2010). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
PER CURIAM: * FN* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-11127
Decided: March 13, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)